Writings:
Tagore and Theosophy:
In this writing I will be shaking/deconstructing the foundations of my own beliefs in my examination of the relationship between Rabindranath Tagore, (and his philosophy/school), and Theosophy. My primary motive for doing this came when I realized the eerie similarities between the tenets of Luciferian Theosophy and Tagore's humanist “religion of man.”
Firstly, it should be known that Tagore has occupied a special place in my heart for some time now. I was in Bangladesh, Tagore's native land, in 2005 for six months. While I was there I kept hearing the name Tagore uttered, but never bothered looking into the man, or what he'd done. It wasn't until early 2008 that I saw a documentary on his life by Satyajit Ray, (which you can watch on Google Video I believe? It's a ~50 minute documentary). Tagore was a philosopher, poet/writer, humanitarian, educator, and diplomat. He was the first Asian to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. His influence on the 20th century is largely ignored by most.
Anyways, my gradual realization of the life and works of Tagore led me to take drastic action in my own life, by giving away all of my most material possessions and hitch-hiking across Amerika. I kid you not. ;) Truly, I can attribute this action directly to what I learned from and gleaned from Rabindranath Tagore.
As you may remember from watching my first video, my critique of Lenon Honor, I suspended my research for a while when I was in the woods. Upon returning to Babylon ~6 months ago I quickly fell into researching propaganda/subliminals, and their relationships to the New Age Movement. Naturally, I realized the impact of Theosophy and its disciples, and then the ultimate Luciferian philosophy/agenda of Theosophists, Lucis Trust, etc.
Now, HPB traveled extensively in India and what is now Bangladesh, and it has been confirmed that during her travels she stayed as a guest of Maharishi Devendranath Tagore, Rabindranath's father. Devendra was an influential “spiritual reformer” in India in the mid- 1800s through his preaching the monotheistic basis of Hinduism as revealed in the Vedas & Upanishads, the “original” orthodox Hindu texts. (I myself was surprised to learn how many of the various gods of the Hindus, (i.e. Ganesh, Durga, Kali, Lakshmi), are recent developments in the Hindu religion, so to speak. They are the products of regionally-specific beliefs/superstitions/traditions merging with the theistic Vedas & Upanishads. Apparently, as I said, in it's oldest/truest most orthodox form, Hinduism is a monotheistic religion, and God is known as Brahma. (Not to be confused with the caste of Brahman).).
In my opinion, the entire House of Tagore, it could be said, were/are known not necessarily because of their contributions to culture, but because of the family's overall “sellout” to British royalism and their implementation of the domineering and “civilized” western culture which dominated India for so long. The first Indian to work in the British Civil Service was a Tagore. In addition to being intellectuals and artists, (which are the traits that were “presented” as initial credence to their respectability), the Tagore family were quite vocal in their capitulating and rationalizing British rule in India, which, of course, led to a degree of social ostracism for the Tagore household. The Tagores were British sympathizers and apologetics of the highest order. Granted, they wanted that what was sacred and “holy” in their culture to be preserved, however they were still among the loudest advocates to the introduction of western “culture” into India.
Tagore's father, Devendranath, as I said, was a spiritual reformer, a job which Rabindranath carried on extensively. His son, Rabindranath, most likely carrying on his father's vision, envisioned a new spiritual era for humanity, quite similar in context to what Blavatsky and the Theosophists were advocating. Given the already present physical Blavatsky-Tagore connexion through Jorashanko, (name of the Tagore family household), and how Devi's vision of a “new spirituality” aligns so nicely with the Luciferian Blavatsky's, would it not be wise to examine the possibility of Rabindranath's philosophy being influenced by Theosophy ??
One can safely assume that since Rabi wasn't satisfied with the present Abrahamic religions of the world, that he did indeed desire a “new age” of spirituality for the world. Tagore's spiritual reform indirectly entails a rejection of these Abrahamic faiths, rejects notions of a personal savior, and, as revealed in his final opus, The Religion of Man, I could describe as “sacred, humanistic, self-worship.”
In Tagore's poetry can be found a common and pervading theme: he was constantly referring to and communing with God, Brahma, the Creator of all existence and consciousness. Tagore was a monotheist, indeed, and sought a new spirituality for the world. My sincere hope is that his “God” was the same Creator God that Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship, and not Lucifer, because as we know, when Luciferians declare their allegiance to “God,” the god they're pledging themselves to is not the God of Moses, but Lucifer.
Now, at this point I wonder whether or not Tagore was knowingly pushing an agenda which was directly in line with the goals of Luciferian Theosophy, or whether he was simply put upon a pedestal, unintentionally preaching a message which was in accord with Luciferian Theosophy philosophy. He did not publicly or directly reject the philosophy of Christ to my knowledge, but the fact that he never claimed/preached a “new spirituality for the world” implies that he did not think Christ was worthy of our spiritual energy.
Thusly, was Rabindranath Tagore's message of spiritual reform deliberate?, which would make sense given the influence of his father on his own spiritual path, his father being potentially influenced by the admitted Luciferian Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. Or, was Tagore just a “useful idiot” as Communist propagandists would say?, Rabi, unknowingly and idealistically pushing a philosophy that Luciferian Theosophy could use to their own ends.
I've read Rabindranath's final work, Religion of Man, about a year or two ago, and therefore it is not so fresh in my mind. However, I feel I can still safely summarize his overall message of that book, which was for a new era of international and intellectual cooperation which would yield the hopeful new spirituality of the future which is to replace “selfish and outdated monotheism.”
Again, that's my rough summary from a book I read some time ago. If you're more Tagore savvy than I, please comment on any possible errors in my summation of Tagore's Religion of Man. Peer review.
Now, a couple bits from that summary need to be emphasized:
- international cooperation (UN, globalism, one world)
- intellectual understanding (science, “knowing,” Lucifer)
Tagore's constant stressing of international cooperation, which was a pervading theme of his message throughout most of his life, can quite easily be associated with the globalist one world order that's being sought by the Luciferian elite. And, the intellectual understanding he spoke of is nothing more than his own faith in the mind, his belief that we can comprehend the mysteries of existence, fully, with only our cerebral capabilities, which, it must be noted, is the direct opposite of faith, that which is to be holy, the giving of our spiritual energy to the Creator, rather than to ourselves or the earth.
My personal opinion on all this is that Tagore was a “useful idiot.” He was placed upon a pedestal and given a platform to speak his message which the Luciferians knew would gradually influence people to acquiesce to their ultimate plan for the future. Tagore was used in a variety of ways. Consider how he was awarded the Nobel Prize, which we now know to be a Freemasonic “faux award” front, presented merely to establish credibility and convince the masses into believing that he is authority, one allowed to speak on behalf of humanity, worthy of our respect. Not that he didn't earn it; the poetry of Gitanjili is beautiful! However, as I said before, if he was considered a “useful idiot” by the Luciferian elite, then it would make sense why he was given so many accolades and ultimately “presented” to the world, sent on so many envoys.
In conclusion, my ultimate message through this video is the same as with my first, which was: don't put too much faith into humans. I mean, glean what you discern to be honest, but keep your mind open to the fact that they could be misleading you. Heck, even me! All of this is my opinion. Although I sincerely do not believe myself to be misleading you, I still encourage you to do your own research and come to your own conclusions! And, as always, please post your comments and/or questions.
I thank you for watching, and hope you found it informative and enlightening.
(2009)
Tagore and Theosophy:
In this writing I will be shaking/deconstructing the foundations of my own beliefs in my examination of the relationship between Rabindranath Tagore, (and his philosophy/school), and Theosophy. My primary motive for doing this came when I realized the eerie similarities between the tenets of Luciferian Theosophy and Tagore's humanist “religion of man.”
Firstly, it should be known that Tagore has occupied a special place in my heart for some time now. I was in Bangladesh, Tagore's native land, in 2005 for six months. While I was there I kept hearing the name Tagore uttered, but never bothered looking into the man, or what he'd done. It wasn't until early 2008 that I saw a documentary on his life by Satyajit Ray, (which you can watch on Google Video I believe? It's a ~50 minute documentary). Tagore was a philosopher, poet/writer, humanitarian, educator, and diplomat. He was the first Asian to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. His influence on the 20th century is largely ignored by most.
Anyways, my gradual realization of the life and works of Tagore led me to take drastic action in my own life, by giving away all of my most material possessions and hitch-hiking across Amerika. I kid you not. ;) Truly, I can attribute this action directly to what I learned from and gleaned from Rabindranath Tagore.
As you may remember from watching my first video, my critique of Lenon Honor, I suspended my research for a while when I was in the woods. Upon returning to Babylon ~6 months ago I quickly fell into researching propaganda/subliminals, and their relationships to the New Age Movement. Naturally, I realized the impact of Theosophy and its disciples, and then the ultimate Luciferian philosophy/agenda of Theosophists, Lucis Trust, etc.
Now, HPB traveled extensively in India and what is now Bangladesh, and it has been confirmed that during her travels she stayed as a guest of Maharishi Devendranath Tagore, Rabindranath's father. Devendra was an influential “spiritual reformer” in India in the mid- 1800s through his preaching the monotheistic basis of Hinduism as revealed in the Vedas & Upanishads, the “original” orthodox Hindu texts. (I myself was surprised to learn how many of the various gods of the Hindus, (i.e. Ganesh, Durga, Kali, Lakshmi), are recent developments in the Hindu religion, so to speak. They are the products of regionally-specific beliefs/superstitions/traditions merging with the theistic Vedas & Upanishads. Apparently, as I said, in it's oldest/truest most orthodox form, Hinduism is a monotheistic religion, and God is known as Brahma. (Not to be confused with the caste of Brahman).).
In my opinion, the entire House of Tagore, it could be said, were/are known not necessarily because of their contributions to culture, but because of the family's overall “sellout” to British royalism and their implementation of the domineering and “civilized” western culture which dominated India for so long. The first Indian to work in the British Civil Service was a Tagore. In addition to being intellectuals and artists, (which are the traits that were “presented” as initial credence to their respectability), the Tagore family were quite vocal in their capitulating and rationalizing British rule in India, which, of course, led to a degree of social ostracism for the Tagore household. The Tagores were British sympathizers and apologetics of the highest order. Granted, they wanted that what was sacred and “holy” in their culture to be preserved, however they were still among the loudest advocates to the introduction of western “culture” into India.
Tagore's father, Devendranath, as I said, was a spiritual reformer, a job which Rabindranath carried on extensively. His son, Rabindranath, most likely carrying on his father's vision, envisioned a new spiritual era for humanity, quite similar in context to what Blavatsky and the Theosophists were advocating. Given the already present physical Blavatsky-Tagore connexion through Jorashanko, (name of the Tagore family household), and how Devi's vision of a “new spirituality” aligns so nicely with the Luciferian Blavatsky's, would it not be wise to examine the possibility of Rabindranath's philosophy being influenced by Theosophy ??
One can safely assume that since Rabi wasn't satisfied with the present Abrahamic religions of the world, that he did indeed desire a “new age” of spirituality for the world. Tagore's spiritual reform indirectly entails a rejection of these Abrahamic faiths, rejects notions of a personal savior, and, as revealed in his final opus, The Religion of Man, I could describe as “sacred, humanistic, self-worship.”
In Tagore's poetry can be found a common and pervading theme: he was constantly referring to and communing with God, Brahma, the Creator of all existence and consciousness. Tagore was a monotheist, indeed, and sought a new spirituality for the world. My sincere hope is that his “God” was the same Creator God that Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship, and not Lucifer, because as we know, when Luciferians declare their allegiance to “God,” the god they're pledging themselves to is not the God of Moses, but Lucifer.
Now, at this point I wonder whether or not Tagore was knowingly pushing an agenda which was directly in line with the goals of Luciferian Theosophy, or whether he was simply put upon a pedestal, unintentionally preaching a message which was in accord with Luciferian Theosophy philosophy. He did not publicly or directly reject the philosophy of Christ to my knowledge, but the fact that he never claimed/preached a “new spirituality for the world” implies that he did not think Christ was worthy of our spiritual energy.
Thusly, was Rabindranath Tagore's message of spiritual reform deliberate?, which would make sense given the influence of his father on his own spiritual path, his father being potentially influenced by the admitted Luciferian Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. Or, was Tagore just a “useful idiot” as Communist propagandists would say?, Rabi, unknowingly and idealistically pushing a philosophy that Luciferian Theosophy could use to their own ends.
I've read Rabindranath's final work, Religion of Man, about a year or two ago, and therefore it is not so fresh in my mind. However, I feel I can still safely summarize his overall message of that book, which was for a new era of international and intellectual cooperation which would yield the hopeful new spirituality of the future which is to replace “selfish and outdated monotheism.”
Again, that's my rough summary from a book I read some time ago. If you're more Tagore savvy than I, please comment on any possible errors in my summation of Tagore's Religion of Man. Peer review.
Now, a couple bits from that summary need to be emphasized:
- international cooperation (UN, globalism, one world)
- intellectual understanding (science, “knowing,” Lucifer)
Tagore's constant stressing of international cooperation, which was a pervading theme of his message throughout most of his life, can quite easily be associated with the globalist one world order that's being sought by the Luciferian elite. And, the intellectual understanding he spoke of is nothing more than his own faith in the mind, his belief that we can comprehend the mysteries of existence, fully, with only our cerebral capabilities, which, it must be noted, is the direct opposite of faith, that which is to be holy, the giving of our spiritual energy to the Creator, rather than to ourselves or the earth.
My personal opinion on all this is that Tagore was a “useful idiot.” He was placed upon a pedestal and given a platform to speak his message which the Luciferians knew would gradually influence people to acquiesce to their ultimate plan for the future. Tagore was used in a variety of ways. Consider how he was awarded the Nobel Prize, which we now know to be a Freemasonic “faux award” front, presented merely to establish credibility and convince the masses into believing that he is authority, one allowed to speak on behalf of humanity, worthy of our respect. Not that he didn't earn it; the poetry of Gitanjili is beautiful! However, as I said before, if he was considered a “useful idiot” by the Luciferian elite, then it would make sense why he was given so many accolades and ultimately “presented” to the world, sent on so many envoys.
In conclusion, my ultimate message through this video is the same as with my first, which was: don't put too much faith into humans. I mean, glean what you discern to be honest, but keep your mind open to the fact that they could be misleading you. Heck, even me! All of this is my opinion. Although I sincerely do not believe myself to be misleading you, I still encourage you to do your own research and come to your own conclusions! And, as always, please post your comments and/or questions.
I thank you for watching, and hope you found it informative and enlightening.
(2009)