Even Subtle Fallacies are handled/rectified by logic. Logic is executed by mathematics. In modern day, handled by mathematics/modelling, algorithms.
Fallacy correction (by logic and math or whatever tools you use), has no power or influence on the soundness or veracity of premises or axioms.
Our cognition/mind/intuitive understanding decide what are the acceptable, agreeable premises.
When our dualistic view point discovered the the fallacy of dualism or fallacy within the premises itself, and have seen the gimps of underlying unity, it got scared because that's the best we have got and we are sure its not the ultimate reality.
Instead confronting the truth, it revolted and still trying to make sens of the reality in dualistic term. In doing so, it created the monstrosity of science with few apparently (because we did not create anything, we just used and harnessed what was existing there to begin with), impressive (because for general people are not privileged enough to know how ( often how stupidly the project started and how simple it was, although the apparent complexity seems to arisen because there are many many simple steps) scientific achievements are done. they only see only the finalized product, and hence are impressed) achievements.
Non-dualisting other systems are not looking the unity by dualistic cognition, and they are fine and are not rebel. I don't know if they are consciously aware of the system either. But the the drive to seek unity is still in there.
Science is a reaction/defense of fear.
Fear of the weakness of human language/cognition. Primordial drive to seek leading to the act of observing /sensing the underlying unity by newly evolved dualistic mind created a violent rejection because the duality of the mind itself is in danger. That's the Birth of modern science. And Its based on at least mundane casuistry, if not, sophisticated sophistry.
More From Web:
Fallacy correction (by logic and math or whatever tools you use), has no power or influence on the soundness or veracity of premises or axioms.
Our cognition/mind/intuitive understanding decide what are the acceptable, agreeable premises.
When our dualistic view point discovered the the fallacy of dualism or fallacy within the premises itself, and have seen the gimps of underlying unity, it got scared because that's the best we have got and we are sure its not the ultimate reality.
Instead confronting the truth, it revolted and still trying to make sens of the reality in dualistic term. In doing so, it created the monstrosity of science with few apparently (because we did not create anything, we just used and harnessed what was existing there to begin with), impressive (because for general people are not privileged enough to know how ( often how stupidly the project started and how simple it was, although the apparent complexity seems to arisen because there are many many simple steps) scientific achievements are done. they only see only the finalized product, and hence are impressed) achievements.
Non-dualisting other systems are not looking the unity by dualistic cognition, and they are fine and are not rebel. I don't know if they are consciously aware of the system either. But the the drive to seek unity is still in there.
Science is a reaction/defense of fear.
Fear of the weakness of human language/cognition. Primordial drive to seek leading to the act of observing /sensing the underlying unity by newly evolved dualistic mind created a violent rejection because the duality of the mind itself is in danger. That's the Birth of modern science. And Its based on at least mundane casuistry, if not, sophisticated sophistry.
More From Web: