| Thelema |
|---|
| Core topics |
| Mysticism |
| Thelemic texts |
| Organizations |
| Deities |
|
| Related topics |
Aiwass[pronunciation?] is the name given to a voice that English occultist Aleister Crowley claimed to have heard on April 8, 9, and 10 in 1904. Crowley claimed that this voice, which he considered originated with a discarnate intelligence, dictated The Book of the Law (or Liber Legis) to him.
The dictation[edit]
According to Crowley, the first appearance of Aiwass was during the Three Days of the writing of Liber al vel Legis. His first and only identification as such is in Chapter I: "Behold! it is revealed by Aiwass the minister of Hoor-paar-kraat" (AL I:7).[1]
Hoor-paar-kraat (Egyptian: Har-par-khered) is more commonly referred to by the Greek transliteration Harpocrates, meaning "Horus the Child", whom Crowley considered to be the central deity within the Thelemic cosmology (see: Aeon of Horus). However, Harpocrates also represents the Higher Self, the Holy Guardian Angel.
In late Greek mythology as developed in Ptolemaic Alexandria, Harpocrates (Ancient Greek:Ἁρποκράτης) is the god of silence. Harpocrates was adapted by the Greeks from the Egyptian child godHorus. To the ancient Egyptians, Horus represented the newborn Sun, rising each day at dawn. When theGreeks conquered Egypt under Alexander the Great, they transformed the Egyptian Horus into theirHellenistic god known as Harpocrates, a rendering from Egyptian Har-pa-khered or Heru-pa-khered(meaning "Horus the Child").
Crowley described the encounter in detail in The Equinox of the Gods, saying:
In the later-written Liber 418, the voice of the 8th Aethyr says "my name is called Aiwass," and "in The Book of the Law did I write the secrets of truth that are like unto a star and a snake and a sword." Crowley says this later manifestation took the form of a pyramid of light.
Identity[edit]
Crowley went to great pains to argue that Aiwass was an objectively separate being from himself, possessing far more knowledge than he or any other human could possibly have. He wrote "no forger could have prepared so complex a set of numerical and literal puzzles".[4] As Crowley writes in his Confessions: "I was bound to admit that Aiwass had shown a knowledge of the Cabbala immeasurably superior to my own"[5] and "We are forced to conclude that the author of The Book of the Law is an intelligence both alien and superior to myself, yet acquainted with my inmost secrets; and, most important point of all, that this intelligence is discarnate."[6]Finally, this excerpt (also from Confessions, ch.49):