Satanic ritual abuse (SRA)

7:49 PM | BY ZeroDivide EDIT
Engraving by Henry de Malvost in the book Le Satanisme et la Magie by Jules Bois depicting a Black Mass, part of an earlier moral panic of religious desecration and Satanic ceremonies that was a precursor to the satanic ritual abuse moral panic of the late 20th century
Satanic ritual abuse (SRA, sometimes known as ritual abuse,ritualistic abuseorganised abusesadistic ritual abuse and other variants) was a moral panic that originated in the United States in the 1980s, spreading throughout the country and eventually to many parts of the world, before subsiding in the late 1990s. Allegations of SRA involved reports of physical and sexual abuse of people in the context of occult orSatanic rituals. In its most extreme form, SRA involved a supposed worldwide conspiracy involving the wealthy and powerful of the world elite in which children were abducted or bred for sacrifices, pornography andprostitution.
Nearly every aspect of SRA was controversial, including its definition, the source of the allegations and proof thereof, testimonials of alleged victims, and court cases involving the allegations and criminal investigations. The panic affected lawyers', therapists', and social workers' handling of allegations of child sexual abuse. Allegations initially brought together widely dissimilar groups, including religious fundamentalists, police investigators, child advocates, therapists and clients in psychotherapy. The movement gradually secularized, dropping or deprecating the "satanic" aspects of the allegations in favor of names that were less overtly religious such as "sadistic" or simply "ritual abuse" and becoming more associated with dissociative identity disorder and governmentconspiracy theories.
The panic was influenced to a large extent by testimony of children and adults that were obtained using therapeutic and interrogation techniques now considered discredited. Initial publicity generated was by the now-discredited autobiographyMichelle Remembers (1980), and sustained and popularized throughout the decade by the McMartin preschool trial. Testimonials, symptom lists, rumors and techniques to investigate or uncover memories of SRA were disseminated through professional, popular and religious conferences, as well as through the attention of talk shows, sustaining and spreading the moral panic further throughout the United States and beyond. In some cases allegations resulted in criminal trials with varying results; after seven years in court, the McMartin trial resulted in no convictions for any of the accused, while other cases resulted in lengthy sentences, some of which were later reversed. Scholarly interest in the topic slowly built, eventually resulting in the conclusion that the phenomenon was a moral panic, with little or no validity beyond paranoia.
Official investigations produced no evidence of widespread conspiracies or of the slaughter of thousands; only a small number of verified crimes have even remote similarities to tales of SRA. In the latter half of the 1990s interest in SRA declined and skepticism became the default position, with only a minority of believers giving any credence to the existence of SRA.

founding religions or religious philosophies

11:28 PM | BY ZeroDivide EDIT
This article lists historical figures credited with founding religions or religious philosophies or people who first codified older known religious traditions. It also lists those who have founded a specific major denomination within a larger religion.
In many cases, one can regard a religion as a continuous tradition extending to prehistoric times without a specific founder (Vedic religion or Dharmic religion, folk religionanimism), or with legendary founding-figures whose historicity has been widely questioned (such Rishabha). This notwithstanding, many historical expressions of such religions will still have founders. Religion often develops by means of schism and reform(motivated by theological speculation), and it becomes a matter of judgement at what point such a schism or reform should be considered the "foundation" of a new religious tradition. For example, Martin Luther and John Wesley worked for reforms but their efforts failed to influence the whole Church and the end result was a new tradition within Christianity.
Chronologically, foundations of religious traditions may sub-divide into:
  1. the Axial Age, with foundations to HinduismZorastrianismJainismBuddhismConfusianismJudaism and with the earliest known major founding figures such as ZoroasterConfucius, and Buddha.
  2. Hellenism to Late Antiquity, with foundations of classical religious traditions and schools such as various sects of Early Christianity,StoicismGnosticism.
  3. the medieval to early modern period, with the rise of Islam, the Bhakti movementZen Buddhism, and the Protestant Reformation.
  4. new religious movements, since c. 1800.

Ancient (before AD 500)[edit]

See culture hero for legendary founders of doubtful historicity.
NameReligious tradition foundedLife of founder
Naram-Sin of Akkadfirst known ruler to impose an imperial cult22nd century BC (short chronology)
Ur-Nammubuilt the Ziggurat of Ur to Nanna21st century BC (short chronology)
AkhenatenAtenism14th century BC (conventional Egyptian chronology)
ParshvaThe penultimate (23rd) Tirthankara in Jainism877–777 BC[1][2][3][4]
Zoroastercomposed the gathas foundational to Zoroastrianismc. 10th to 6th century BC[5][n 1]
Numa PompiliusRoman king who codified and organized the Roman religion717 BC – 673 BC
LaoziTaoism6th century BC
Nebuchadnezzar IIbuilt the Etemenanki, established Marduk as the patron deity ofBabylon6th century BC
MahaviraThe final Tirthankara in Jainism599–527 BC[6]
Siddhārtha Gautama BuddhaBuddhismc. 5th century BC
ConfuciusConfucianism551 BC – 479 BC
PythagorasPythagoreanismfl. 520 BC
MoziMohism470 BC – 390 BC
Ezra HaSoferestablished Second Temple Judaism[7]fl. 459 BC[n 2]
EpicurusEpicureanismfl. 307 BC
Zeno of CitiumStoicism333 BC – 264 BC
PatanjaliRaja Yoga (part of Hinduism)2nd century BC
JesusChristianityc. 5-4 BC - c. 33 AD
Paul the Apostle and Saint PeterPauline Christianity1st century AD
James the JustJewish Christianity1st century AD
Judah haNasiTalmudic Rabbinical Judaism2nd century AD
Marcion of SinopeMarcionism110–160
NagarjunaMadhyamaka150–250
PlotinusNeoplatonism205–270
ManiManichaeism216–276
Arius[n 3]Arianism[n 4]250–336
Pelagius[n 3]Pelagianism[n 5]354–430
Nestorius[n 3]Nestorianism[n 6]386–451
EutychesMonophysitism[n 7]380–456

Totalitarian democracy

7:53 AM | BY ZeroDivide EDIT
Totalitarian democracy is a term made famous by Israeli historian J. L. Talmon to refer to a system ofgovernment in which lawfully elected representatives maintain the integrity of a nation state whosecitizens, while granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of the government.[1] The phrase had previously been used by Bertrand de Jouvenel[2] and E.H. Carr,[3]and subsequently by F. William Engdahl[4] and Sheldon S. Wolin.[5]

Criticism of Rousseau's ideas[edit]

Talmon's 1952 book The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy discusses the transformation of a state in which traditional values and articles of faith shape the role of government into one in which social utility takes absolute precedence. His work is a criticism of the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a Swissphilosopher whose ideas influenced the French Revolution. In The Social Contract, Rousseau contends that the interests of the individual and the state are one and the same, and it is the state's responsibility to implement the "general will".
The political neologism "messianic democracy" also derives from Talmon's introduction to this work:
Indeed, from the vantage point of the mid twentieth century the history of the last hundred and fifty years looks like a systematic preparation for the headlong collision between empirical and liberal democracy on the one hand, and totalitarian Messianic democracy on the other, in which the world crisis of to-day consists. [1]
In a similar vein, Herbert Marcuse, in his 1964 book One-Dimensional Man, describes a society in which, in his words, "…liberty can be made into a powerful instrument of domination. … Free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves..."[6]

Eye of Ra

2:10 AM | BY ZeroDivide EDIT
The Eye of Ra can be equated with the disk of the sun, with the cobras coiled around the disk, and with thewhite and red crowns of Upper andLower Egypt.
The Eye of Ra or Eye of Re is a being in ancient Egyptian mythology that functions as a feminine counterpart to the sun god Ra and a violent force that subdues his enemies. The Eye is an extension of Ra's power, equated with the disk of the sun, but it also behaves as an independent entity, which can be personified by a wide variety of Egyptian goddesses, including HathorSekhmetBastetWadjet, and Mut. The Eye goddess acts as mother, sibling, consort, and daughter of the sun god. She is his partner in the creative cycle in which he begets the renewed form of himself that is born at dawn. The Eye's violent aspect defends Ra against the agents of disorder that threaten his rule. This dangerous aspect of the Eye goddess is often represented by a lioness or by the uraeus, or cobra, a symbol of protection and royal authority. The Eye of Ra is similar to the Eye of Horus, which belongs to a different god, Horus, but represents many of the same concepts.
The Eye of Ra was involved in many areas of ancient Egyptian religion, including in the cults of the many goddesses who are equated with it. Its life-giving power was celebrated in temple rituals, and its dangerous aspect was invoked in the protection of the pharaoh, of sacred places, and of ordinary people and their homes.

Egyptian mythology

1:59 AM | BY ZeroDivide EDIT

Nun, the embodiment of the primordial waters, lifts the barque of the sun god Ra into the sky at the moment of creation.
Egyptian mythology is the collection of myths from ancient Egypt, which describe the actions of the Egyptian gods as a means of understanding the world. The beliefs that these myths express are an important part of ancient Egyptian religion. Myths appear frequently in Egyptian writings and art, particularly in short stories and in religious material such as hymns, ritual texts, funerary texts, and templedecoration. These sources rarely contain a complete account of a myth and often describe only brief fragments.
Inspired by the cycles of nature, the Egyptians saw time in the present as a series of recurring patterns, whereas the earliest periods of time were linear. Myths are set in these earliest times, and myth sets the pattern for the cycles of the present. Present events repeat the events of myth, and in doing so renew maat, the fundamental order of the universe. Amongst the most important episodes from the mythic past are the creation myths, in which the gods form the universe out of primordial chaos; the stories of the reign of the sun god Ra upon the earth; and the Osiris myth, concerning the struggles of the gods OsirisIsis, and Horus against the disruptive god Set. Events from the present that might be regarded as myths include Ra's daily journey through the world and its otherworldly counterpart, the Duat. Recurring themes in these mythic episodes include the conflict between the upholders of maat and the forces of disorder, the importance of thepharaoh in maintaining maat, and the continual death and regeneration of the gods.
The details of these sacred events differ greatly from one text to another and often seem contradictory. Egyptian myths are primarily metaphorical, translating the essence and behavior of deities into terms that humans can understand. Each variant of a myth represents a different symbolic perspective, enriching the Egyptians' understanding of the gods and the world.
Mythology profoundly influenced Egyptian culture. It inspired or influenced many religious rituals and provided the ideological basis for kingship. Scenes and symbols from myth appeared in art in tombs, temples, and amulets. In literature, myths or elements of them were used in stories that range from humor to allegory, demonstrating that the Egyptians adapted mythology to serve a wide variety of purposes.

Origins[edit]

The development of Egyptian myth is difficult to trace. Egyptologists must make educated guesses about its earliest phases, based on written sources that appeared much later.[1] One obvious influence on myth is the Egyptians' natural surroundings. Each day the sun rose and set, bringing light to the land and regulating human activity; each year the Nile flooded, renewing the fertility of the soil and allowing the highly productive farming that sustained Egyptian civilization. Thus the Egyptians saw water and the sun as symbols of life and thought of time as a series of natural cycles. This orderly pattern was at constant risk of disruption: unusually low floods resulted in famine, and high floods destroyed crops and buildings.[2] The hospitable Nile valley was surrounded by harsh desert, populated by peoples the Egyptians regarded as uncivilized enemies of order.[3] For these reasons, the Egyptians saw their land as an isolated place of stability, or maat, surrounded and endangered by chaos. These themes—order, chaos, and renewal—appear repeatedly in Egyptian religious thought.[4]
Another possible source for mythology is ritual. Many rituals make reference to myths and are sometimes based directly on them.[5] But it is difficult to determine whether a culture's myths developed before rituals or vice versa.[6] Questions about this relationship between myth and ritual have spawned much discussion among Egyptologists and scholars of comparative religionin general. In ancient Egypt, the earliest evidence of religious practices predates written myths.[5] Rituals early in Egyptian history included only a few motifs from myth. For these reasons, some scholars have argued that, in Egypt, rituals emerged before myths.[6] But because the early evidence is so sparse, the question may never be resolved for certain.[5]
In private rituals, which are often called "magical", the myth and the ritual are particularly closely tied. Many of the myth-like stories that appear in the rituals' texts are not found in other sources. Even the widespread motif of the goddess Isis rescuing her poisoned son Horus appears only in this type of text. The Egyptologist David Frankfurter argues that these rituals adapt basic mythic traditions to fit the specific ritual, creating elaborate new stories based on myth.[7] In contrast, J. F. Borghouts says of magical texts that there is "not a shred of evidence that a specific kind of 'unorthodox' mythology was coined… for this genre."[8]
Much of Egyptian mythology consists of origin myths, explaining the beginnings of various elements of the world, including human institutions and natural phenomena. Kingship arises among the gods at the beginning of time and later passed to the human pharaohs; warfare originates when humans begin fighting each other after the sun god's withdrawal into the sky.[9] Myths also describe the supposed beginnings of less fundamental traditions. In a minor mythic episode, Horus becomes angry with his mother Isis and cuts off her head. Isis replaces her lost head with that of a cow. This event explains why Isis was sometimes depicted with the horns of a cow as part of her headdress.[10]
Some myths may have been inspired by historical events. The unification of Egypt under the pharaohs, at the end of the Predynastic Period around 3100 BC, made the king the focus of Egyptian religion, and thus the ideology of kingship became an important part of mythology.[11] In the wake of unification, gods that were once local patron deities gained national importance, forming new relationships that linked the local deities into a unified national tradition. Geraldine Pinch suggests that early myths may have formed from these relationships.[12] Egyptian sources link the mythical strife between the gods Horus and Set with a conflict between the regions of Upper[set] and Lower Egypt[Horus], which may have happened in the late Predynastic era or in the Early Dynastic Period.[13][Note 1]
After these early times, most changes to mythology developed and adapted preexisting concepts rather than creating new ones, although there were exceptions.[14] Many scholars have suggested that the myth of the sun god withdrawing into the sky, leaving humans to fight among themselves, was inspired by the breakdown of royal authority and national unity at the end of the Old Kingdom (c. 2686 BC – 2181 BC).[15] In the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BC), minor myths developed around deities like Yam and Anat who had been adopted from Canaanite religion. In contrast, during the Greek and Roman eras (332 BC–641 AD), Greco-Roman culture had little influence on Egyptian mythology.[16]