"Man is the measure of all things" -Protagoras
Upanishad says, “Self-luminous is that Being, and formless. He dwells within all and without all. He is unborn, pure, greater than the greatest, without breath, without mind.”
Upanishad states, “The Cosmic Self ... created the whole world of living and non-living things. He created them and then entered into them.”
“All that it has is its Self in him alone. He is the truth, He is the subtle essence of all. He is the self. And that, Svetaketu, THAT ART THOU”
Humans derive their lofty status from the Brahman’s presence in them, a presence that links them with the rest of the universe in which Brahman is also present. The dawning of the awareness of the oneness of everything demolishes the colonial attitude toward nature as well as the arrogance that leads to violence. The Isha Upanishad says, “And he who sees all beings in his own self and his own self in all beings, he does not feel any revulsion by reason of such a view.” It adds, “When to, one who knows, all beings have, verily, become one with his own self, then what delusion and what sorrow can be to him who has seen the oneness?” (Translation by S Radhakrishnan).
\
Hanuman enquires about the different kinds of "liberation" (Mukti, hence the name of the Upanishad), to which Rama answers that "the only real type [of liberation] is Kaivalya (solitude/nirvana)"
The Brahman is the universal spirit and the Atman is the individual Self.
Brahman probably comes from the root brh, which means "The Biggest ~ The Greatest ~ The ALL." Brahman is "the infinite Spirit Source and fabric and core and destiny of all existence, both manifested and unmanifested and the formless infinite substratum and from whom the universe has grown". Brahman is the ultimate, both transcendent and immanent, the absolute infinite existence, the sum total of all that ever is, was, or shall be. The word Atmanmeans the immortal perfect Spirit of any living creature, being, including trees etc. The idea put forth by the Upanishadic seers that Atman and Brahman are One and the same is one of the greatest contributions made to the thought of the world.
The mantra Aum Shānti Shānti Shānti, translated as "the soundless sound, peace, peace, peace", is often found in the Upanishads. The path of bhakti or "Devotion to God" is foreshadowed in Upanishadic literature, and was later realized by texts such as the Bhagavad Gita
Upanishad says, “Self-luminous is that Being, and formless. He dwells within all and without all. He is unborn, pure, greater than the greatest, without breath, without mind.”
Upanishad states, “The Cosmic Self ... created the whole world of living and non-living things. He created them and then entered into them.”
“All that it has is its Self in him alone. He is the truth, He is the subtle essence of all. He is the self. And that, Svetaketu, THAT ART THOU”
Humans derive their lofty status from the Brahman’s presence in them, a presence that links them with the rest of the universe in which Brahman is also present. The dawning of the awareness of the oneness of everything demolishes the colonial attitude toward nature as well as the arrogance that leads to violence. The Isha Upanishad says, “And he who sees all beings in his own self and his own self in all beings, he does not feel any revulsion by reason of such a view.” It adds, “When to, one who knows, all beings have, verily, become one with his own self, then what delusion and what sorrow can be to him who has seen the oneness?” (Translation by S Radhakrishnan).
\
Hanuman enquires about the different kinds of "liberation" (Mukti, hence the name of the Upanishad), to which Rama answers that "the only real type [of liberation] is Kaivalya (solitude/nirvana)"
The Brahman is the universal spirit and the Atman is the individual Self.
Brahman probably comes from the root brh, which means "The Biggest ~ The Greatest ~ The ALL." Brahman is "the infinite Spirit Source and fabric and core and destiny of all existence, both manifested and unmanifested and the formless infinite substratum and from whom the universe has grown". Brahman is the ultimate, both transcendent and immanent, the absolute infinite existence, the sum total of all that ever is, was, or shall be. The word Atmanmeans the immortal perfect Spirit of any living creature, being, including trees etc. The idea put forth by the Upanishadic seers that Atman and Brahman are One and the same is one of the greatest contributions made to the thought of the world.
The mantra Aum Shānti Shānti Shānti, translated as "the soundless sound, peace, peace, peace", is often found in the Upanishads. The path of bhakti or "Devotion to God" is foreshadowed in Upanishadic literature, and was later realized by texts such as the Bhagavad Gita
| Sanskrit quote | English meaning | Upanishad |
|---|---|---|
| Prajñānam brahma | "Consciousness is Brahman" | Aitareya Upanishad |
| Aham brahmāsmi | "I am Brahman" | Brihadaranyaka |
| Tat tvam asi | "That Thou art" | Chandogya |
| Ayamātmā brahmā | "This Atman is Brahman" | Mandukya |
The three main approaches in arriving at the solution to the problem of the Ultimate Reality have traditionally been the theological, the cosmological and the psychological approaches.[46] The cosmological approach involves looking outward, to the world; the psychological approach meaning looking inside or to the Self; and the theological approach is looking upward or to God. Descartes takes the first and starts with the argument that the Self is the primary reality, self-consciousness the primary fact of existence, and introspection the start of the real philosophical process.[47] According to him, we can arrive at the conception of God only through the Self because it is God who is the cause of the Self and thus, we should regard God as more perfect than the Self. Spinoza on the other hand, believed that God is the be-all and the end-all of all things, the alpha and the omega of existence. From God philosophy starts, and in God philosophy ends. The manner of approach of the Upanishadic philosophers to the problem of ultimate reality was neither the Cartesian nor Spinozistic. The Upanishadic philosophers regarded the Self as the ultimate existence and subordinated the world and God to the Self. The Self to them, is more real than either the world or God. It is only ultimately that they identify the Self with God, and thus bridge over the gulf that exists between the theological and psychological approaches to reality. They take the cosmological approach to start with, but they find that this cannot give them the solution of the ultimate reality. So, Upanishadic thinkers go back and start over by taking the psychological approach and here again, they cannot find the solution to the ultimate reality. They therefore perform yet another experiment by taking the theological approach. They find that this too is lacking in finding the solution. They give yet another try to the psychological approach, and come up with the solution to the problem of the ultimate reality. Thus, the Upanishadic thinkers follow a cosmo-theo-psychological approach.[47] A study of the mukhya Upanishads shows that the Upanishadic thinkers progressively build on each other's ideas. They go back and forth and refute improbable approaches before arriving at the solution of the ultimate reality
| Deussen (1000 or 800 – 500 BCE) | Ranade (1200 – 600 BCE) | Radhakrishnan (800 – 600 BCE) |
|---|---|---|
| Ancient prose Upanishads: Brihadaranyaka, Chandogya, Taittiriya, Aitareya, Kaushitaki, Kena Poetic Upanishads: Kena, Katha, Isa, Svetasvatara, Mundaka Later prose: Prasna, Maitri, Mandukya | Group I: Brihadaranyaka, Chāndogya Group II: Isa, Kena Group III: Aitareya, Taittiriya, Kaushitaki Group IV: Katha, Mundaka, Svetasvatara Group V: Prasna, Mandukya, Maitrayani | Pre-Buddhist, prose: Aitareya, Kaushitaki, Taittiriya, Chāndogya, Brihadaranyaka, Kena Transitional phase: Kena (1–3), Brihadaranyaka (IV 8–21), Katha, Mandukya Elements of Samkhya and Yoga: Maitri, Svetasvatara |
While the hymns of the Vedas emphasize rituals and the Brahmanas serve as a liturgical manual for those Vedic rituals, the spirit of the Upanishads is inherently opposed to ritual. Anyone who worships a divinity other than the Self is called a domestic animal of the gods in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. The Chāndogya Upanishad parodies those who indulge in the acts of sacrifice by comparing them with a procession of dogs chanting Om! Let's eat. Om! Let's drink. In similar fashion, the pattern of reducing the number of gods in the Vedas becomes more emphatic in the Upanishads. When Yajnavalkaya is asked how many gods exist, he decrements the number successively by answering thirty-three, six, three, two, one and a half and finally one. Vedic gods such as the Rudras, Visnu, Brahma are gradually subordinated to the supreme, immortal and incorporeal Brahman of the Upanishads. In fact Indra and the supreme deity of the Brahamanas, Prajapati, are made door keepers to the Brahman's residence in the Kausitaki Upanishad
Based on these common features some scholars, most notably E.J. Urwick and M.L. West (distinguished Greek Scholar) , have argued that the Ancient Greek philosophy was influenced by, and borrowed some core concepts from, the Upanishads. Various mechanisms for such a transmission of knowledge have been conjectured including Pythagoras traveling as far as India; Indian philosophers visiting Athens and meeting Socrates; Plato encountering the ideas when in exile in Syracuse; or, intermediated through Persia.
Arthur Schopenhauer read the Latin translation and praised the Upanishads in his main work, The World as Will and Representation (1819), as well as in hisParerga and Paralipomena (1851). He found his own philosophy was in accord with the Upanishads, which taught that the individual is a manifestation of the one basis of reality. For Schopenhauer, that fundamentally real underlying unity is what we know in ourselves as "will". Schopenhauer used to keep a copy of the Latin Oupnekhet by his side and commented, "It has been the solace of my life, it will be the solace of my death"
Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, praised the mystical and spiritual aspects of the Upanishads.[83] Schelling and other philosophers associated with German idealism were dissatisfied with Christianity as propagated by churches. They were fascinated with the Vedas and the Upanishads.
In the United States, the group known as the Transcendentalists were influenced by the German idealists. These Americans, such as Emerson and Thoreau, were not satisfied with traditional Christian mythology and therefore embraced Schelling's interpretation of Kant's Transcendental idealism, as well as his celebration of the romantic, exotic, mystical aspect of the Upanishads.
T. S. Eliot, inspired by his reading of the Upanishads, based the final portion of his famous poem The Waste Land (1922) upon one of its verses
Erwin Schrödinger, the great quantum physicist said, "The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West.
German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, impressed by the Upanishads, called the texts "the production of the highest human wisdom.
The Upanishads have been translated into various languages including Persian, Italian, Urdu, French, Latin, German, English, Dutch, Polish, Japanese, Spanish and Russian.[95] The Moghul Emperor Akbar's reign (1556–1586) saw the first translations of the Upanishads into Persian,[96][97] and his great-grandson, Dara Shikoh, produced a collection called Sirr-e-Akbar (The Greatest Mysteries) in 1657, with the help of Sanskrit Pandits of Varanasi. Its introduction stated that the Upanishads constitute the Qur'an's "Kitab al-maknun" or hidden book.[98] But Akbar's and Sikoh's translations remained unnoticed in the Western world until 1775.[96]
Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron, a French Orientalist who had lived in India between 1755 and 1761, received a manuscript of the Upanishads in 1775 from M. Gentil, and translated it into French and Latin, publishing the Latin translation in two volumes in 1802–1804 as Oupneck'hat.[99] The French translation was never published.[100] The first written English translation came in 1805 from Colebrooke,[101] who was aware of 170 Upanishads. Sadhale's catalog from 1985, the Upaniṣad-vākya-mahā-kośa lists 223 Upanishads.[102]
The first German translation appeared in 1832 and Roer's English version appeared in 1853. However, Max Mueller's 1879 and 1884 editions were the first systematic English treatment to include the 12 Principal Upanishads.[95] After this, the Upanishads were rapidly translated into Dutch, Polish, Japanese and Russian.[
The one hundred most influential books, according to Seymour-Smith, in the approximate chronological order he gives: